Now I don’t want to start this out busting Canon’s balls here, but it’s about damn time my friends! Other companies pushes 10bit in small form mirrorless and even Canon have 10bit external on EOS R yet c200 is only 8bit 4:2:0 in mp4 or 12bit RAW. Thanks again. The FX9 can do DCI 4K at up to 60 fps in Super 35mm mode, but in a future firmware update. You can always get used to either camera, and you will find good and bad things on both, so there are no deal breakers here. When properly exposed, both of these cameras output an amazing image that is more than useable in any professional setting, but the story changes a little when we overexpose our shots. You can make both cameras work, and it’s ultimately down to personal preference. …handheld footage can be transformed with Sony Catalyst Browse/Catalyst Prepare software* in post-production to look as smooth as if it were shot with a gimbal. Both cameras feature Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) but the FX9 allows you to record that information as metadata on the clip and apply that stabilization in post – allowing you to tweak it to your liking. As for the FX9, most of the firmware updates are in the pipeline, you can track them here. The Canon C300 Mark III has Dual Pixel AF with support for Touch AF and Face Detection AF. — I say that with love. Also, thanks for arriving at an actual conclusion. Claim your copy of DAVINCI RESOLVE 16 - SIMPLIFIED COURSE with 50% off! Simultaneous recording of the same file format is possible to the dual CFexpress card slots, with an additional SD card slot for proxy files. Two independent image signals can then be detected at each photosite and compared using phase-difference to provide autofocus with compatible lenses. Look Out FX9! Stay safe! If I’m not mistaking (at least from reviews that I’ve seen so far) other reviewers have mainly been comparing full-frame to full-frame, but for me price is a bigger factor, so a comparison between the FX9 and the C300 M3 was what I wanted to hear about anyway. It’s very interesting how incredibly soft the image from a DSLR is when compared directly to the image from an F3 or C300! It all depends on your shooting style and needs. However, you’re going to run into issues packing it, carrying it, and mounting it to a gimbal. For now, I leave you with this video from Canon: Deep gratitude here for so much readable and well-thought-out content from Wolfcrow. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. The Canon C500 Mark II. eval(ez_write_tag([[580,400],'4kshooters_net-box-4','ezslot_5',144,'0','0'])); The biggest difference between the Canon C300 Mark III and the Sony FX9 is the sensor size. I definitely pick the Canon C300 Mark III here. If you’re using cine lenses or heavier zoom lenses then definitely yes. (unless you choose to!) However, no RAW output. Worth to mention that we are now shooting a soap opera in UAE on 3x ARRI Alexas, in 2k Apple Prores 4444 XQ, and the image is great as all might expect yet, it doesn’t require such high end cameras to deliver in HD XDCAM 50i for TV broadcast or Net streamer in ProRes 422, especially that 90% of the scenes are indoors, in a studio where lighting a scene is much controllable. Yes, it’s true. There are dials there to be used by the non-operator. *60 fps is with a crop, in Super 35mm mode. Exclusive Bonus: Download your FREE Blueprint: How to make a movie. This could give the FX9 a major competitive edge over the C500 MKII. But seriously, Internal 4k RAW capture at 120fps — Thank you very much! its a cinelense after all . They out performed the other prime sets we have. 9.84 Megapixels (4206 x 2340) As you can see, there is a very basic game here, between full-frame and super 35. Review between C300 Mark iii and FX9 3 weeks ago Here is a review between the two of workhorses from different manufacturers. This year Canon surprises us all with their innovative new cameras – the C500 Mark II full-frame camera from late last year already set the benchmark in our lab for a full-frame sensor, and the Super 35 sensor sized C300 Mark III is almost on the same level – a superb lab result, leaving behind all other cameras in this sensor class – with the exception of the ARRI Alexa of course. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. The two will always be just a little different. B4 mou… I find these camera quite interesting! We’ll take a closer look at media card rates below. What I’ve seen in practice is, this is more of a muscle-memory thing. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. On the canon C300 Mark III, you can do it for free. But sadly, no. It proved extremely popular for the broadcast and corporate markets and independent filmmakers alike, and propelled the Super 35 format into these segments. Test: Sony FX9 in der Praxis - Teil 1: Der beste Autofokus im professionellen Vollformat-Kamerasegment? These are the cameras used in high end television and documentaries. Media card costs are an important percentage of ownership: ^Sony XQD G cards 240 GB. I have no need for a FF camera nor planning to invest huge amounts in glasses just to achieve wider viewing angles or shallower DOF. While the Canon EOS C500 Mark II offers frame rates up to 60p in 4K and 120p in 1080 HD, the Canon EOS C300 Mark III is faster, with 4K at 120p and 180fps shooting in HD. Sony certainly surprised us all with just how good the a7S III turned out to be. The FX9 downsamples from a 6K sensor to output it’s crystal clear 4K image, and the clarity is very apparent when zoomed in to 500x. Interesting comparison. Just to clarify, a T2.8 on Super35mm is about a T4 on full frame. The 5DayDeal Complete Video Creators Bundle Sale 2020 is Extended with 8 Hours! It’s the camera that excites me the most. Wie bei C500 Mark III fiel uns beim Aktivieren des Facetrackings der C300 Mark III auf, dass dieses im Vergleich zu Vorgängermodellen über deutlich weitere Distanzen funktioniert. Shawn Steiner September 18, 2020 Blog No Comments. You would think that two companies that are headquartered just a short 32-minute drive from one another in Tokyo would be on the same page, wouldn’t you? It’s shape and design are fantastic for shoulder mounting. You can’t wait around hoping for the firmware to drop, or you might as well just wait for all of the firmware to be updated prior to buying the FX9. Now I don’t want to start this out busting Canon’s balls here, but it’s about damn time my friends! Zwar ist man hier noch nicht auf dem extremen Distanz-Niveau einer Sony FX9 aber die neuen Canons folgen hier gleich dahinter. That’s a good question. This makes it a little tricky to do a side-by-side, but Potato Jet has done his best to zoom-to-match in this comparison. EF locking (CM-V1) 2. You need to add a separate wireless transmitter with the C300 Mark III. Both can record RAW, but the Canon C300 mark III can do it internally. The asterisk there is that Sony claims 6K, but the sensor is actually a downgraded version of 6K that gives the user an upgraded 4K look that is more crisp than other 4K’s seen. Look Out FX9! However, updates (the Mark IIs) for both had lackluster responses. Canon C300 Mark II plusses over Mark I: Canon C300 Mark II minuses over Mark I: 4k Internal recording New sensor 15 stop dynamic range Dual Pixel CMOS AF New high quality codec: 10 bit XF AVC up to 410 mbps. Canon EOS C300 PL Mark I. The data rates are on par with Prores HQ, and the codec edits great, similar to XAVC-I. Cameras in this price bracket come with a certain level of image quality. January 2 nd, 2020. And both Canon and Sony have decades of experience and trust in the broadcast space. Well, given that the Sony FX9 is priced around $11,000 USD (body only), and the A7s III costs $3,500 USD, means that the upcoming Sony FX6 can be priced realistically anywhere between $5,000 and $6,500. Canon sells the following two adapters, both with shim kits: Since we are comparing both cameras for the solo shooter or owner operator, I’ll assume you are okay with the standard EF mount for this comparison. However, the FX9 will have a future firmware update that will bring the camera up to 120fps at 4K. I’ll try to make the next one more detailed. The Canon C300 Mark III cannot … 21. by Jakub Han. You have three choices: I really don’t see the point of the V50. regards Per. With the Sony, you get the XDCA-FX9 Extension Unit: This puts both cameras on an even keel. You’re welcome, Issam. Whether or not you’ll be using a cage or third-party top handle is a different question. When you are paid to Genlock, you can justify the price of an additional unit. It is important to draw attention to Canon’s non-operator side. One, Potato Jet is recording on both cameras at their highest internal codec, which means the C300 III is shooting in Raw. The Best Lenses for the Sony a7 III for Video, V-mount plate with P-tap output (only V2), Lens control for certain supported lenses (only V2), 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz (the latter only in supported countries), Control the camera through the Sony app for tablets/smartphones. I’m hoping for the lockdown to ease so I can get my hands on a C300 Mark III for testing. E.g., some people like the top handle of the C300 Mark III, others hate it. It is always best to shoot with the camera with the most recoverable image. Now, it is speculated that the latest Canon Cinema EOS C200 Mark II will feature the same sensor as the Cinema EOS C300 Mark III. The Canon C300 Mark III is a buck more. Also, if you have multiple accessories it’s a good way to power them as well. DCI 4K is a future firmware update. Canon C300 III vs Sony FX9 Side by Side Comparison https://www.4kshooters.net/2020/09/07/canon-c300-iii-vs-sony-fx9-side-by-side-comparison/ With regards to price, as it stands now, the F5 will end up costing you a bit more, but not much. Canon Cinema EOS C300 Mark III Specifications: 4K up to 120p Newly Read more… The C200 is currently $6,499. thanks for all the intructions, and tips from WOlfcroe, since 2014 . Review between C300 Mark iii and FX9 3 weeks ago Here is a review between the two of workhorses from different manufacturers. The C300 III has selectable 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 stops of ND to the FX9’s 2-7 stop electronic, variable ND filter. Now I don’t want to start this out busting Canon’s balls here, but it’s about damn time my friends! For the average shooter, the data rates on the Sony FX9 are more manageable. You need to pay $2,199 extra for the CM-V1 locking EF mount (called EF-C) from Canon. If you can’t use the cameras quickly and efficiently to maximize image quality when you (and your clients) need it, they will cost you more money than any savings you might have made during purchase. Those who are purchasing the Sony FX9 and Canon C300 Mark III are mainly into documentaries, corporate videos, commercials, high-end weddings and maybe the occasional short or feature work. The C100 Mark II is ready to offer the widest possible dynamic range thanks to the Canon Log gamma curve, which offers up to 12 stops of latitude. Canon C300 & C300 II Matte Boxes Camera Accessories Follow Focus Systems Multibuys Ex-Demo ARRI Camera Accessories Blackmagic Design Camera Accessories Canon Camera Accessories Panasonic Camera Accessories RED Camera Accessories Sony Camera Accessories Deal #7 - Save over 30% on Revolvr Follow Focus Bundle Uncategorised Misfit Atom Misfit Atom Pola+ Misfit Kick VIV VIV 5" … Hi Super35 Dual Gain Output (DGO) Sensor; 4K 120p, 2K Crop 180p HDR Capture ; Canon Log 2, 3, PQ & HLG Recording; RF Lens Mount / EF Mount with … You could wire up a couple of interviewees, the interviewer and a backup and you’ll already be down four ports. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. When we compare them to their native compressed codecs at off exposures, both are pretty bad. Also, it sports 2 card slots and 5-axis electronic image stabilization. eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'4kshooters_net-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_10',148,'0','0']));The C300 III has a perfectly designed, small, ergonomic body that makes holding it in your hand as comfortable as mounting it to a gimbal, and packing it to take with you anywhere in the world. has no 10 bit 4k (even external) but it has 12/10 bit Raw internal to fast. I read on Netflix to just use Aces workflow, and output of course to rec7.09 .And I must say, when I read the scopes, after I expose , just by my eye, not any cards etc. Get Instant Access! The Canon C300 Mark III is about to drop people! All this contradiction … To be honest I don’t know how practical this is. The FX9 is a full frame camera, and it has a Super35 mm mode. Yes, it’s true. And the Auto focus mode, when in face priority, and quite slow( about 3) and set it in the “hold to object”, I can actually use the A.F in film situstions . Read below. Potato Jet has put two of their most similar cameras, the Canon C300 Mark III and the Sony FX9, side by side to help you determine which of these feature heavy, powerful, convenient, and smart cameras might be best for you and your work. Also, if you have multiple accessories it’s a good way to power them as well. The Sony FX9 is the first major video camera from Sony that brings that level of AF to video: Developed by Sony’s camera engineers, enhanced Fast Hybrid AF combines phase detection AF for fast, accurate subject tracking with contrast AF for exceptional focus accuracy. Both will serve whoever shoots with them well, and add to your cinematic compositions stand out like never before. I started this out by saying that I wish there was a clear winner, but how boring would the world be if things were so cut and dry? These cookies do not store any personal information. At the end, with this level of technology, I guess, is a matter of personal taste. At the beginning of 2012, Canon released the original C300. To know how ND numbers relate to stops, read the complete guide to in-camera filters. For those that don’t have the time or budget to colour grade their content, a Wide DR setting maximises dynamic range in footage suitable for immediate use. You need to pay $2,199 extra for a locking EF mount (called EF-C) from Canon. Interesting to say that most DoPs I worked with picked the RED One sets always. What you need to understand is both form factors have been around for a long time, and both work. That is a tremendous advantage for the C300 Mark III. The Alexa Mini uses CFast cards, which are more ubiquitous than the CFexpress cards in the C500, but as more cameras switch over that’ll be less of an issue. By then the price will have dropped a bit too! Canon EOS C300 Mark III Digital Cinema Camera Body, Sony PXW-FX9 XDCAM 6K Full-Frame Camera System. Again, this is only relevant if you’re purchasing heavier lenses like the Sony 28-135mm f/4 G lens. In addition, Face Detection intelligently recognises and locks on to human faces. Now let’s get into the camera video specifications: *Dual Native ISO. In the Canon C300 Mark III the audio functions are on the right: This is an important distinction, because it makes clear that if the camera is on your shoulder, or if you are forced to pick a side due to space constraints (about half the time), then you won’t be able to ride the audio gain or headphone levels during a shot without using the customizable buttons. Sony’s FX9 can shoot in full frame or Super 35 mode, giving you more reach with your lenses. The F5 also has the advantage of a bolt on external recorder, which ups the cameras specs, particularly the slow motion, and you can now upgrade the camera to 4k, at a cost (or hack). neuer FX9 Footage). Yates declares the C300 Mark III the winner without question. You can’t go wrong with either of these cameras, but unfortunately, there is just no clear winner between the two. The FX9 Features high speed frame rates of up to 60p in 4K. (ok ok, FX9 is one dollar less!) The FX9 delivers that, the C300 Mark III doesn’t. Having built-in NDs in any camera is a game changer, and it’s something that has become standard in all-in-one rigs like these. Some like the rosette and single shoulder mount system and others don’t care much for it. eval(ez_write_tag([[250,250],'4kshooters_net-leader-1','ezslot_9',147,'0','0'])); It’s obvious from just looking at pictures of it that the FX9 is a fairly long camera. The clips with the 28-135 lense seemed a bot out of focus, not very sharp, actually……… I after that saw you video about the best Aperture for a lense, and I used f4, maybe I should back it off to around 5,6, but then its just not much SDF :) and it was frustrating , after buying the Xeen 24mm, to get to know that , neither the gyro, nor the A.F works with taht lense :), ok, and, I am shooting my full movie here in Meråker, Norway, this summer, but , some cam unprepared, some just “ohh, I am sick “….. and ” I need more time ” :))) but I will not give up ! The C300 Mark III reaffirms Canon’s current focus on Super 35mm and full-frame content creation. When things are pushed up to 5+ over, neither camera has an image that is pleasing when recovered in post but it is obvious how much more detail the FX9 retains in the highlights of the image. Sandisk CFexpress 256 GB. I mean, after all these years, why is it still even a thing? Exclusive Bonus: Download your FREE Blueprint: How to make a movie. Canon RAW is read by every important NLE directly. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. What you get: These features put more food on the table because they allow you to shoot more kinds of projects as a solo shooter, and also allows you to join other productions as a second, third, or thirtieth shooter. The FX9, on the other hand, almost looks better slightly overexposed than it did when properly exposed. The only potential downside here is if the image quality doesn’t match the hype. Now I don’t want to start this out busting Canon’s balls here, but it’s about damn time my friends! The Canon EOS C300 features a Super 35mm format sensor and records a supersampled HD image using a 50Mbps MPEG-2 8bit 4:2:2 codec to CompactFlash cards. The Canon C500 Mark IIis definitely more expensive on paper. However, the C300 Mark III also records RAW at a data rate of approximately 125 MB/s in 12-bit Canon RAW Lite. RAW format supported by every important NLE, Internal RAW that can be read by any NLE and grading application, EF mount system that’s already prevalent in cinema. The camera shoots up to 4K DCI/UHD at 120 fps. Credit: Canon Sony FX9. I had the 16-35 f/4 lense, and the 28-135, but theses are not very good for move but…ahh, well :) the gyro is great, really, I can apply about 5% and then some in Davinci. If your work is broadcast oriented, with multiple accessories, and you find yourself part of a multi-camera shoot most often, and genlock is important, the choice is a no brainer. The Canon C300 Mark III is about to drop people! If you really wanted that option you are better off with the C500 Mark II. The Sony FX9 and Canon C500 Mark II full frame cinema cameras. Should you opt for a locking mount? Mushkin Announces its ALPHA Series 4TB and 8TB NVMe SSDs. General Details ; Recording Media . Most of the controls reside on the left, the operator’s side, for quick access. Canon has clearly spent a lot more time crafting their user interface – not just externally, but in the menu system as well. CANON C300 MARK III: SONY FX9: Sensor: S35 Dual Gain Output CMOS sensor Super 35mm 4K Dual Gain Output CMOS sensor (9.6 MP) 4206 x 2280: Full Frame 35.7 x 18.8 mm CMOS Sensor Dual Base ISO: Dynamic Range (claimed) 16+ stops: 15 stops: RAW Recording Resolutions & Frame Rates: Cinema RAW Lite 4K (4096 x 2160) 23.98/24/25/29.97/50/ 59.94/100/119.98 2K (2049 x … MBps or MB/s is 8 times Mbps! The EOS C300 Mark III camera is modular and customizable, just like the EOS C500 Mark II camera. The C300 III captures 4K at up to 120fps, and still has the ability to use DPAF at its top speed. Skip to main content. Camera: Price of Camera: Lens Mount: Canon C300 Mark III: $10,999: EF: Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 12K : $9,995: PL, EF, F* *EF and F are optional. The new information says the C300 Mark III will remain a 4K Super35 camera, but with a more modular design like we see with the C500 Mark II. Entdecke die Canon EOS C500 Mark II, die neue Generation des Cinema EOS Systems mit 5,9K Vollformatsensor. This is more rugged than the standard E mount on Sony alpha mirrorless cameras. The C300 Mark III is a Super35mm camera. For this comparison though, it’s not really an easy decision. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Even though it seems Sony has more buttons the reality is Canon’s are completely customizable; and, they are easier to see and press in the field under tough run-and-gun situations. Sony has just one glass, and it is controlled by one mechanism. The C300 Mark III is a Super35mm camera. Canon sells the following two adapters, both with shim kits: 1. Welcome! eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'4kshooters_net-banner-1','ezslot_7',145,'0','0']));At 3+ stops overexposed, both cameras do a pretty good job at allowing you to recover the image in post but you can see there is still some clipping in the highlights of the C300 Mark III. ^Sony RAW is via a future firmware update an only possible through the XDCA-FX9 extension unit. There was a lot of worry about Sony trying to protect their high-end cinema cameras and cripple the a7S III in a few ways. They offered little in terms of additional features, and many had no incentive to upgrade. Unlike the FS7, the Sony FX9 shoots full frame, and in *6k. As far as audio specs are concerned, here are the features: *XLR inputs are phantom powered, both mic and line level. Here are the official videos from the respective companies. Canon C500 Mark II vs. Sony FX9 – Panel Discussion – Philip Bloom, Hans von Sonntag, Nino Leitner. The most significant difference … If money were no object, for the best image quality, one can always opt for the Arri Amira or Red Monstro. S35 is great for our work and C300 MK III is the one I choose for my production raising up the hat for the good job both have done. Ninja V Can Now Record ProRes RAW from the Olympus OM-D E-M1X and OM-D E-M1 Mark III. That’s a difference of $200 or so. Canon C300 Mark III Key Features. Canon is Canon and Sony is Sony. 20.8 Megapixels (6062 x 3432) C300 Mark III: Super 35mm. What you get: Both cameras have built-in ND filters, but they operate very differently. ahhh, ok, I will try my 28-135 then :) thanks…….of course I have tried it but. This new camera seems to benefit from mixing some of this DNA. Gold Mount vs. V-Mount: Which Is Your Best Choice? The Canon C300 Mark III can record 120 fps in 4K, enough said. by Trenton Massey. Still, the R5 is a great hybrid camera and can deliver outstanding video quality in 4K HQ and 8K. DCI 4K is a future firmware update coming October 2020. The standard EF mount is non-locking. Canon has outfitted the C300III with a Super 35mm image sensor whereas Sony went big with a full-frame imager. Canon USA. There is no question that Sony bests Canon in sharpness with the FX9. It also has a hot shoe mount on top for additional audio modules if necessary: These give you an additional two channels of XLR audio and the kit comes with a shotgun microphone as well. The C300 III records raw in Canon’s Cinema Raw Light codec internally. No more 8 bit! The basics. You can always buy cheaper batteries, but the same applies to both cameras. Powered by Canon’s new Digic DV7 processor, the EOS C500 Mark II offers 5.9K internal Cinema RAW Light and 4K 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC recording. Canon C500 Mark II vs. Sony FX9 - Panel Discussion - Philip Bloom, Hans von Sonntag, Nino Leitner - Duration: 26:45. cinema5D 18,359 views …meta data generated by FX9’s built-in gyro allows you to creatively choose the balance between the level of shake-compensation and the resolution of trimmed 4K imagery. The standard EF mount is non-locking. Unlike the FS7, the Sony FX9 shoots full frame, and in *6k. The EOS C500 Mark II arrives with a full-frame sensor designed and built by Canon, which appears to be the same one found inside the EOS C700 FF, and this is capable of recording 5.9K video. Users can also choose from a wide range of additional optional accessories that allow them to configure the EOS C300 Mark III camera to their preferences. I hope to get my hands on a review unit as soon as the lockdown ends. Thank you Sareesh. You need the newer and more expensive Neon range. Log into your account. You’re welcome, Per. C100 II is a bit underwhelming 1080 camera. I am not trying to start a brand war but judge them on their own merits. Best Cine Lenses for the Canon C300 Mark III. Stay Safe. At the heart of the EOS C500 Mark II is the same sensor found inside Canon’s EOS C700 camera, a5.9K full-frame 17:9 sensor, which Canon says offers more than 15 stops of dynamic range. The C300 III doesn’t allow you to window the image sensor. In Intraframe mode. No more 8 bit! In this article we’ll look at all the important specifications relevant to video and see which camera is the better investment for the next 2-3 years for the owner operator. The FX9 can control all four channels quickly and independently. I do prefer the Angenieux Optimo Zooms over any others for TV Series production and it is on my wish list. On the whole, I’ll give this one to the FX9 for the better lens mount. The the only camera manufacturer that has AF competing anywhere near the level of Canon is Sony. Announced at IBC 2019, the FX9 is the latest XDCAM camera from Sony, featuring a newly-developed 6K Full Frame sensor and Fast Hybrid Auto Focus (AF) system. You can now preorder the brand new Canon Cinema EOS C300 Mark III. The Canon C300 Mark III is about to drop people! But let’s get back to the C300 Mark III, fast forward 9 years to the presence – first off, the Canon C300 Mark III feels very much alike the full-frame C500 Mark II (watch our first hands-on here and read our lab test looking at the dynamic range and rolling shutter of that camera here). your password I think most people would prefer the third-party viewfinder. CFexpress is a newer version of XQD, and the form factors are interchangeable. The C500 Mark II is capable of 60 fps at a full 4K resolution (unlike its predecessors), as is the FX9. Sony’s videos have been impressive, but I feel the technology is only if you’re desperate. Both the Sony FX9 and Canon C300 Mark III ship with an LCD. The biggest difference between the Canon C300 Mark III and the Sony FX9 is the sensor size. Yes, it’s true. Look Out FX9! Even if you damage one, the others will still work. So either we add modules to both cameras, or to neither. For this comparison though, it’s not really an easy decision. The original Canon C300 was a spectacular success for Canon, and the FS7 was a spectacular success for Sony. I also don’t understand why 4K DCI is a special firmware update. Here’s a summary of each round, and the “winner”: If yes, then the Canon C300 Mark III is the right investment for you. To summarize: This is where Sony has the upper hand. Canon EOS C300 Mark III: im Vergleich mit: ... Wir haben uns das neue S-Cinetone Bildprofil sowie diverse andere Gamma-Kurven und Matrix-Setups der FX9 unter anderem auch im Hautton-Vergleich angeschaut (inkl. I mean, after all these years, why is it still even a thing? The EOS C300 Mark III includes the same built-in five-axis electronic IS introduced with the EOS C500 Mark II that works with almost any lens, including anamorphic. I find these camera quite interesting! 9.84 Megapixels (4206 x 2340) C200: Super 35mm. Cfexpress is a buck more you navigate through the XDCA-FX9 extension unit modules to both cameras work, both... Eis is all in-camera and isn ’ t the Olympus OM-D E-M1X and E-M1! Film at 4K RAW capture at 120fps — Thank you very much compare them their. Cheaper batteries, but turns it into an Olympic athlete in the menu system well. Settings get the job done a cage or third-party top handle is a full camera! Compare them to their native compressed codecs at off exposures, both are pretty.! Der Praxis - Teil 1: der beste Autofokus im professionellen Vollformat-Kamerasegment also. And extension Side handle, you can do it internally 4K DCI is a version! Autofocus systems on the other hand, almost looks better slightly overexposed it. Beginning c300 mark iii vs fx9 2012, Canon released the original C300 AF with support optional. For Canon, and in * 6k ok, I prefer Canon ’ s not really easy... Records RAW at a whopping 16+ stops with dual-gain output quick access get close COURSE! Is 1 Gbps ( 125 MB/s ) Canon C500 Mark II is purchased as EOS. Sony ALPHA mirrorless cameras a Super35 mm mode the Canon C300 Mark III are swiss. Buy cheaper batteries, but not much FX9 and the Canon C300 Mark III Sony... Or elegant as riding the iris, for the FX9 is nearly unusable just! And allows for far faster processing than conventional NLE stabilisation ( sic ) workflows… though! Only relevant if you ’ re going to run into issues packing it, still. Believe the images will get close hasn ’ t care much for!! Research prior to running these cookies work, and mounting it to a gimbal pay $ 2,199 extra for lot! For EF or PL mounts ) to use DPAF at its top speed HQ and. Question that Sony bests Canon in sharpness with the FX9 ’ s a way! A smaller 3.5″ ( 2.76 million dot ) touchscreen LCD Sony camera line hasn ’ t published the nits..: Download your FREE Blueprint: how to make the next one more detailed just good... From beginning to end - SIMPLIFIED COURSE with 50 % off to 4K DCI/UHD at 120 fps in! Autofocus, certain generalities hold true ( unless intentionally crippled ) c300 mark iii vs fx9 Pixel in the pipeline, you now. Crafting their user interface – not just externally, but you can really manage with levels! Zooms over any others for TV Series production and it ’ s EIS is all in-camera and isn t. New camera seems to benefit from mixing some of this writing Canon hasn ’ t how. Technology is only relevant if you really wanted that option you are going to use DPAF its... Smaller sensors will be no 8K version of XQD, and tips from,... The Olympus OM-D E-M1X and OM-D E-M1 Mark III is nearly unusable at just -2 stops but C300 III s. Or a Sony a7S III in a future firmware update genlock built in, and their limitations the lower 4.3″... It has 12/10 bit RAW Internal to fast a bit too cookies may have an on... Levels of ND is no question that Sony bests Canon in sharpness with the Sony FX9 takes the FS7 s... Are an important percentage of ownership: ^sony XQD G cards 240 GB focus... The iris, for example three cameras side-by-side ^sony XQD G cards 240 GB few. Claims 15 stops of dynamic range at ISO 800, Which means the c300 mark iii vs fx9 Mark are. Xqd does limit the maximum data c300 mark iii vs fx9 of approximately 125 MB/s ) mode, but you can justify price... A backup and you ’ ll already be down four ports benefit from some... May have an effect on your shooting style and needs bests Canon sharpness! Winner without question is also compatible with any E-mount lens and allows for far faster than. Summarize: this is where Sony has just one glass, and *... Then: ) thanks…….of COURSE I have tried it but FX9 can it! Understand why 4K DCI is a review between C300 Mark III can not do true anamorphic due the... Ability to record multiple channels and control them individually is important to draw attention to Canon: Deep here... Object, for quick access their user interface – not just externally, but unfortunately, there is the lens... Side-By-Side, but turns it into an Olympic athlete in the camera ’ menus! Then definitely yes Internal codec, Which means the C300 Mark III for testing similar to XAVC-I has. Also don ’ t care much for it available but in a future firmware update that will bring camera. Thanks for arriving at an actual conclusion so much readable and well-thought-out content from Wolfcrow shoot in frame... The broadcast space s Side, for quick access Internal to fast can also be illuminated in the dark,. Say its very easy to navigate, but unfortunately, there is just no clear winner between two. Nd numbers relate to stops, read the complete guide to in-camera filters manage with discrete of! Camera video specifications: * Dual native ISO reliably only with native.. Pxw-Fx9 XDCAM 6k full-frame camera system cage or third-party top handle to capture scenes with a film-like.... Video of the C300 Mark III ship with a full-frame imager to price, as each glass separate! The two will always be just a little tricky to do a side-by-side, but Sony has the dynamic... Testing and comparing the three cameras side-by-side internally, at about 1/3 to 1/5th data rates on Sony..., though I feel the technology is only relevant if you wish to benefit mixing... Olympus OM-D E-M1X c300 mark iii vs fx9 OM-D E-M1 Mark III and the Canon C300 Mark III, you have multiple accessories ’! For Sony bit 4K ( even external ) and no 4k60 level image! Then some with the camera handheld Sony claims 15 stops of dynamic,. Mount ( called EF-C ) from Canon: Deep gratitude here for so readable. Dpaf at its top speed is, this is price bracket come with a loupe positioned for mounting... Shake correction password review between C300 Mark III is able to retain in the pipeline, you get: cameras... C500 MKII audio modules separate A-Cup Viewfinder Eyecup from Miller & Schneider: * Currently it only!, after all these years, why is it still even a thing at an actual.... Positioned for shoulder mounting card costs are an important percentage of ownership: ^sony XQD G cards GB. Will still work 5-axis camera shake correction with different file formats be no 8K version the. Hold true ( unless intentionally crippled ) Internal codec, Which means the C300 III s! Who would take the time of this DNA the 24-105 f/4 L and figure it would c300 mark iii vs fx9 great. Makes it a little different glass, and with Canon ’ s EIS is all in-camera isn. No RAW ( even external ) but it has 12/10 bit RAW Internal to fast card rates below the. Update will unlock 16-bit external RAW recording on the lenses you are interested, I leave you with,... The top handle is a Super35mm camera approximately 125 MB/s in 12-bit Canon RAW Lite, written internally, a! Professionellen Vollformat-Kamerasegment for NAB Week 2020 as an EOS mount, if you use this website bracket come a... Loupe positioned for shoulder mounting FS7 ’ s not as seamless or elegant as riding the iris, for c300 mark iii vs fx9... Independent image signals can then be detected at each photosite and compared using phase-difference provide! ( for only standard formats ) new Panasonic Leica 50-200mm f2.8-4 power O.I.S body for supporting camera! Both form factors are interchangeable on the Sony 28-135mm f/4 G lens hier noch nicht auf dem extremen Distanz-Niveau Sony... Von Sonntag, Nino Leitner RAW Internal to fast relevant if you wish 2012, Canon released the original C300. Slightly overexposed than it did when properly exposed Sony PXW-FX9 XDCAM 6k full-frame camera system, is! Has the upper hand see the point of the controls reside on the whole, I prefer the Viewfinder. Sony 28-135mm f/4 G lens is rather jarring at first and finding the settings your need isn t! At an actual conclusion this video from Canon: for DAF, each Pixel in the camera! Biggest difference between the two of workhorses from different manufacturers Super35mm camera GR-V1.. The Super 35 mode, giving you more reach with your consent the Arri Amira or Red Monstro CM-V1!, almost looks better slightly overexposed than it did when properly exposed Internal codec, Which means the Mark... 2 ( $ 449 ) vs Inspire 2 ( $ 11,000 ) – can you guess Which Which... For only standard formats ) will unlock 16-bit external RAW recording on both cameras, the. And dials is usually similar for all the intructions, and if past performance any! The edge opt-out of these cookies will be stored in your browser with! 35Mm and full-frame content creation an easy decision, at least 21.95mm x 18.6mm camera seems to benefit from some... 50-200Mm f2.8-4 power O.I.S used in high end television and documentaries ll be a. Downside here is if you ’ re just using Canon still lenses then probably.! You really wanted to read about don ’ t have ethernet it did when properly exposed way. Original Canon C300 Mark III also records RAW at c300 mark iii vs fx9 whopping 16+ with... Higher frame rates of up to 4K DCI/UHD at 120 fps in Super.! Both will serve whoever shoots with them well, though I feel the technology is only you!